Maxsell Real Estate - Latest Comments in Small Brokers vs Large Brokers

Re: Small Brokers vs Large Brokers

dyork — Tue, 15 Jul 2008 14:43:35 -0000

I'm with a small firm and feel we have a distinct advantage because we specialize in residential land, developed lots, and mixed use communities. Our background as land developers for 18+ years provided the perfect segway into this market and we've found that builders and developers love the concept. Since we've had relationships with these people for so many years we get calls all the time to discuss; who is selling; who is buying, where are they buying, etc. It's allowed us to stay on top of this market and network within our niche market. I guess if you're in to "brand loyalty" then one will stick with the big firms.

Re: Small Brokers vs Large Brokers

paynemar — Wed, 18 Jun 2008 15:13:57 -0000

So true--it's funny, the big brands advertise that it the business YOU create but if one of those agents tries to leave and either go to a smaller company or start their own, they start going nuts and telling those agents that 'IN THIS MARKET you NEED a WELL KNOWN BRAND to sell a property" and it scares the agent to death--when those brands start paying my car, cellphone, health insurance, and expense accounts, then I will listen to them!

Re: Small Brokers vs Large Brokers

shaun76 — Sun, 15 Jun 2008 13:50:46 -0000

Brad, I'm asked this same question about once a week. Interesting post. I'm all for the smaller-is-better side of things.

Re: Small Brokers vs Large Brokers

Michelle — Sat, 14 Jun 2008 16:24:56 -0000

I think if you are a small company and using all of the tools available to you than it can really work for your advantage. I'm with a local broker instead of the "big brands" though we are much larger that most small brokers. (We actually have had the market share on listings over the cobrokes despite we only have offices in 3 states while the others are all national companies!)

Re: Small Brokers vs Large Brokers

Vancouver realtor — Thu, 12 Jun 2008 17:03:55 -0000

I a consider myself a "bigger small agent", on the other hand I am under Vancouver ReMax. I think it's a good combination. clients know me as a local agent, on the other hand famous brand helps, when contacting new clients. I am satisfied. On the other hand, it's always a good feeling to be completely free :)
Jay

Re: Small Brokers vs Large Brokers

steve — Wed, 11 Jun 2008 13:16:22 -0000

I agree with the local boutique agency. With reports that now more than 70% of all buyers start out looking online, the pull of a national broker has less and less weight. it used to be a selling tool that you had offices all over the country, but now it means next to nothing (to the consumer anyway).

Re: Small Brokers vs Large Brokers

bnix — Tue, 10 Jun 2008 22:53:11 -0000

@Kevin I couldn't agree more. Brands do matter, but only if they are really good or really bad. In real estate, a potential client could have had a great experience with their last Big Brand Broker and think very favorably about calling an agent with same broker the next time they need RE services. However, it's just as likely that a potential client had a terrible experience with the same Big Brand Broker and would never call an agent from that firm in any market, ever.

Real estate is such a local business that I believe agents who create their own brand of service will stand out amongst a sea of mediocrity. I also believe that large brokerages perpetuate this sea of mediocrity by recruiting for numbers and not quality of service.

Re: Small Brokers vs Large Brokers

Kevin - Alpharetta Real Estate — Tue, 10 Jun 2008 22:40:43 -0000

Brands definitely have power and help consumers make decisions when they have no other criteria on which to decide. I think the problem with most national real estate brands is that they have done nothing to distinguish themselves from the noise. Century 21 arguably does the most national advertising along with Remax but it is all name recognition marketing not product differentiation marketing.

Consumers are so convinced that there isn't a dime's worth of difference between any of the national brands, that it creates space for boutique brokerages and agents strong enough to articulate a real (service) difference.

Re: Small Brokers vs Large Brokers

jemery — Tue, 10 Jun 2008 16:55:34 -0000

I've come to the conclusion, finally, that it's more about the agent than the brokerage brand. If the agent working for the client is good, their experience is likely to be good regardless of broker branding. And the reverse is true as well. I don't care how big your brand is. If it's a REMAX brokerage but the individual agent is no good, it doesn't matter to the client in the least what brand name recognition there is.

Re: Small Brokers vs Large Brokers

diamonddwellings — Tue, 10 Jun 2008 14:47:35 -0000

Way to go, Brad!
You know that I think "Small is the new Big"
Brand recognition will always matter -- but it's still a deeply local recognition.
So, while Remax or KW might be really big in Atlanta -- they are NOT the top brand in some other markets.
With today's tech tools, small firms can have brand impact on the local level that competes with anybody.
Be blessed, Matt

Re: Small Brokers vs Large Brokers

David Podgursky — Tue, 10 Jun 2008 09:08:51 -0000

Brad,
I agree... the corporate mentality stifles the individual in many ways - from branding to personal marketing. The 3 firms in 8 years is a great example of it... every time that happened, YOU had to re-print all your marketing materials. Sure it gave you the chance to touch your clients again but not for the right reason! It shows a lack of stability.
As the big Re/Max franchises here are being sold off and brands are dying by the day, I'm also seeing the tiny sole proprietor locations with FOR RENT signs out.

There is power in unity ... and that means a small boutique that can harness the power of the internet and blogging...drive in leads and provide proper service will attract the buyers. They can also attract top producers who would be upset like you at the big brands. They can also forgo the green agents for an experienced staff and team...let the trainers train them and they'll learn to come over to the boutique in time.

Same thing goes on the mortgage side... the big firms lose the ability to produce a quality customer focused model by spending too much time on growing and too little time on closing.

Re: Small Brokers vs Large Brokers

Tom Royce — Tue, 10 Jun 2008 08:55:40 -0000

Brad,

I think you are right that staying small in this market gives you a competitive advantage. Very Seth Godin'ish.

Re: Small Brokers vs Large Brokers

bnix — Tue, 10 Jun 2008 08:40:20 -0000

Only one that I can verify, there may have been others which weren't obvious the corporate brand made a difference.

Great point about standing out. We're trying to stand up and be accountable for service and hopefully that will make us stand out!

Re: Small Brokers vs Large Brokers

bobwoo — Tue, 10 Jun 2008 08:35:47 -0000

I could not agree more. When I was in both residential and commercial RE brokerage, I always went with the "smaller guys" for the reasons you mention above. I'd rather stand out than get lost in the crowd. It's very cool that you've only lost one listing to a larger brand, too.